Illinigirl salutes a liberal...
Let it never be said that I won't give liberals credit when credit is due.
Tony Blair's speech to Congress today was stirring and impressive. In one short speech, he managed to refocus the discourse on the war on terrorism where it belongs -- that this is all about fighting "the virus of terrorism" and to prevent terrorist organizations from "dividing the world in hate".
I do realize that Tony Blair is just about as socially liberal as they come. However, by no means do I think that he is a bad person. The past year has firmly convinced me that he is a man of principle. He stated his case for fighting this battles and has stood by his beliefs, despite taking a beating in the polls.
However when it comes to individuals like the Clintons and John Edwards, I just find it difficult to believe that they are in politics chiefly to make this world a better place. When I look at them, I see people who are in it for the power, the prestige, and the pocketbook. Everything they do seems calculated and manipulative, about putting themselves in a better situation politically.
This is not to say that the Bush administration is not guilty of some such behavior. I have been pretty disappointed as I watched the President back away from his promises on Title IX and create large federal entitlement programs like the recent prescription drug benefit package. I think these were moves that the adminstration felt they had to make, to maintain a certain degree of popularity and win favor by handing out "free ice-cream" (tm byron) to the moderates.
The difference between political conservatives and political liberals does not have to be that great. In many cases, we want the same things for individuals in our country. We want them to be free, to have jobs, to put food on the table, to have access to health care. The difference is that I, the conservative, would like to see these changes accomplished through tough defense, a roaring free market, and private or religious charity. I just don't happen to believe that the federal government is the most effective and/or appropriate means of dealing with these problems. I'd like to see tolerance come about as a result of a natural change in our society, people valuing one another for who they are regardless of ethnicity or special-interest affiliation...not as the result of laws that magically grant some minority groups more privileges than others.
Bobby A-G and Kevin Holtsberry have recently written about the media's misuse of language regarding politics. "Soundbyte rhetoric" is in full effect lately, as each one of the nine presidential candidates has been spewing the most controversial, confrontational accusations in order to get his voice heard. (Or her voice heard -- can't forget Illinois's own shady Carol Mosely-Braun!)
I have not seen one candidate that has the courage to support the President on this war...even though several of them voted for it just months ago. (If this uranium evidence was so troubling, why didn't they look into it after the SOTU address? It's no more their job to do so than it is that of the president.)
How refreshing it was to turn on the news today and see a liberal politician with principles...even if it's too bad we had to cross the Atlantic Ocean to find one. Tonight, Illinigirl salutes Tony Blair.