She Gives Liberals a Bad Name
Steal a line from Bon Jovi, start my ranting. So I was burning up at work today as I listened to a co-worker tell a young Indian tekkie her take on the primaries. I'll spare you most of the details, but to give you a short summary: she's a baby boomer with job security who thinks it's fine to spend company time and money clogging up the area printers with every e-mail / document she receives from lefty-leaning organizations. While I find it irritating, I generally avoid political discourse with this person for two reasons: 1) Both of us are set in our beliefs and previous exchanges have gone nowhere 2) I don't see this as a smart career move, especially since I'll need to maintain a business relationship with her for some time.
Today though, listening was a bit much for me. I almost lost my temper and stormed over to join the discussion. First, she gave my friend the low-down on yesterday's primaries. This was all well and good -- she's entitled to her opinions. She told him that in her opinion John Edwards was just too inexperienced, that Dean was the best candidate for the job, but that Kerry was primarily seen as the electable one and therefore going to get the nominations. No problems there -- it was actually kind of informative, helping me understand what the opposition is thinking.
Then she told him most people who support President Bush are doing so out of a misguided sense of patriotism and because they are just too stupid to think for themselves and would believe whatever Fox News told them. She then proceeded to tell him that Fox News is so conservative that half of what they put on the air is not true anyways, it's what they are paid by the corporations to tell people to think.
I'm fidgeting in my seat, trying to force myself to remain quiet at this point. Not because this lady is a flaming liberal, that's not why we don't get along. I LIKE quite a few flaming liberals. I don't believe political lefties are bad or dim people. On the contrary, I consider quite a few liberals amongst my better friends. They are generally intelligent and often some of more compassionate and well-meaning people I know. Most just want to take care of everyone -- a very admirable trait that I share with them. We disagree on the best method for doing so: me advocating the growth of various ministries, charities, and private industry to fund good works far and wide, them looking to the government bureaucracies to solve such problems.
My point here is that this lady gives liberals a bad name. This is the same beef I have with many loud Hollywood types -- that they cannot acknowledge that reasonable, thoughtful people can come to different conclusions on the best way to govern.
I'm not fighting the fact that Fox News is an opinion-based news channel. It's generally snippet reporting, full of opinions, and trends towards sensationalistic reporting. However, I do know that I can trust them to NOT ignore the conservative's viewpoint on a given issue. Can't say that for the mainstream media...which is primarily why I rely on newspapers and the Internet for my news stories anymore. But I would argue that almost all the FACTS they air are true, while the opinions are just political commentary. I'm fighting with the fact that this lady felt comfortable explaining our political system to my friend by saying "Everyone supporting Bush is just stupid and misguided". I was embarassed and angry that she felt comfortable explaining our political system to an outsider in that manner...and that she would just basically write me off as stupid. Rest assured I'll be talking to my Indian friend at a later date, explaining the conservative side's viewpoint to him as well.
I have a good friend, a twenty-something fairly staunch Dem who lives out East. Over Christmas, he admitted to me that he watches Fox News reguarly. He also said that he couldn't bring himself to vote for Dean if he won the Democrat nomination. The man just scares him and he didn't think his ideas on defense would be good for the country. We actually discussed a lot of the reasons I dislike Kerry and Edwards (general haughty attitude, preaching class warfare while making millions suing doctors and in turn raising our medical costs, etc.) He outlined his issues with Bush, we explored them, agreed to disagree. He said he'd still probably vote for Kerry/Edwards, but this conversation didn't leave me upset at all. I felt like dialogue occurred and perhaps some understanding had been gained. No opinons changed, but it didn't feel like a waste.
Baby Boomer liberal versus Generation Y liberal...my interactions have been starkly different. It's obviously an anecdote that I cannot use to make a sweeping generalization about political maturity of our generation -- since I've seen evidence to the contrary on comments of many a blog. Perhaps there is hope for some solid debate (and perhaps conservative rtending on issues) if we can just
get the under-thirty crowd involved in the political process.